Something About Minnesota Doesn’t Add Up, And It Isn’t the Fraud Claims
The outrage is new. The investigation is not. So why the sudden pile-on from Musk-world and the MAGA ecosystem?
Something is happening in Minnesota. Not quietly. Not slowly. It is loud, viral, and being held up like the Rosetta Stone of corruption by every major right-wing influencer with a pulse.
A young content creator named Nick Shirley released a video that alleges massive fraud in Minnesota childcare funding programs, pointing cameras at buildings that look empty and declaring it proof of theft. The clip spread like wildfire through their ecosystem. Within hours you saw the blue-check brigade lining up to crown him the new Woodward and Bernstein of the Midwest.
Ted Cruz. Tomi Lahren. Kari Lake. Alex Jones. Mike Flynn. Robby Starbuck. And every second-tier conservative personality desperate for engagement. They were all there, applauding him like he just uncovered Watergate.
Before we sharpen the pitchforks or hand out Pulitzers, we need to take a breath. A deep one. Because hysteria travels faster than truth.
Yes, Minnesota has a fraud problem. Nobody is denying that. Massive fraud involving Feeding Our Future already resulted in over seventy indictments, federal prosecutions, and guilty pleas. That investigation began long before anyone named Nick Shirley ever pressed record.
This story did not materialize last week. What is new is the packaging.
The fraud story isn’t new. The frenzy is.
The Right Is Salivating Over This
And we need to understand why.
There are certain stories conservative media cannot resist. Stories that combine government spending, immigrants, welfare, and the chance to dunk on Democrats in power. Minnesota hits that jackpot.
And then you add the repeated targeting of Rep. Ilhan Omar, who represents a district with a large Somali population, and suddenly people are not talking about fraud in Minnesota. They are talking about Somali fraud in Minnesota. That distinction is not accidental. It is strategic.
If the outrage were about government waste, they would be screaming about fraudulent PPP loans that enriched millionaires. They would be furious about Covid relief scams that dwarf daycare funds. They would bring receipts for fraud everywhere.
But they are not. Only Minnesota matters today. Only Somali suspects are circulating. Only one narrative is being hand-fed to the public, like popcorn at a carnival.
That is when my eyebrow went up.
Viral does not mean verified. Outrage is not evidence.
The Shirley Video: New Hype, Not New Evidence
The viral video shows Shirley walking into quiet daycare centers that appear inactive. He claims those locations are receiving government money. Maybe some are. Maybe some closed temporarily or operate differently than expected. Maybe some are genuine fraud. That is why we have auditors, subpoenas, prosecutors, and judges.
A camera and a narrator are not proof. They are presentation.
And presentation is powerful. Right-wing influencers know this. That is why they rushed to bless the footage as gospel, even though Minnesota officials have been investigating for years and federal authorities have already handed down indictments in related cases. The timing of the outrage is not about discovery. It is about sensational amplification.
Think of football: when an offense completes a questionable play, they sprint to the line hoping to snap the ball before anyone calls for review. The right is trying to snap the ball quickly.
There’s a difference between journalism and performance.
This Was Never Journalism… It Was a Viral Ambush Wrapped in a Detective Costume
Let’s be clear about what Nick Shirley’s video actually is. It is not investigative journalism, it is not a balanced inquiry, it is not a methodical fraud audit. It is a xenophobic YouTuber pile-on; a street-corner sting operation framed as hero-journalism, designed for outrage clicks more than truth.
Everything about his approach reveals intent. Real reporters don’t need shouting, hallway-pressing chest puffery, or hostile ambushes at businesses that open an hour later than when you decide to show up. If you’re doing honest reporting, evidence speaks. You don’t have to.
Instead we get theatrics. We get confrontation. We get the energy of a bounty hunter with a GoPro, not a journalist with receipts. He arrives at one facility at 1pm even though the sign clearly states they open at 2pm… yet the audience is never told. The absence of children is treated as incriminating, not operational.
Observers have pointed out that video timestamps seem conspicuously absent, and signage showing posted hours may have been blurred. That is not transparency. That is framing.
And let’s talk about permission. Filming young children without signed parental consent is not investigative rigor: it’s amateur hour. The same people who declare themselves defenders of children suddenly forget consent forms, privacy laws, and safety protocols when the narrative is too juicy to slow down long enough to follow the rules. So which is it? Are children sacred, or are they props?
Because a pattern becomes obvious quickly: the video works not because it proves anything, but because it looks like it proves something. It was shot and edited to imply guilt, to manufacture suspicion, to let viewers fill in the blanks with fear and prejudice. A staged interrogation isn’t evidence. It’s content.
If journalism needs ambush tactics and blurred signage to function, it’s not journalism. It’s theater.
Not open ≠ suspicious… unless edited to look that way.
The Convenient Silence
While right-wing celebs praise Shirley as a hero, a few voices have stepped up to ask the reasonable question: Why now? Why this clip? Why this suddenly coordinated outrage?
Some local Minnesota users pointed out that regulators have been pursuing fraud long before the video. Others noted that if we truly care about protecting tax dollars, maybe start with Republican-backed corporate theft instead of daycare centers run by brown immigrants. Maybe ask why the same people cheering Shirley had nothing to say when trump pardoned drug traffickers, fraudsters, and grifters who stole real money from real Americans.
Fraud is either a problem everywhere or it is a tool used selectively for narrative. And selective outrage always reveals intent.
Fraud Isn’t New: They Just Only Care When Black and Immigrant Communities Are Accused
If this feeding frenzy was truly about fraud, then Rick Scott would be Exhibit A. His company committed $1.8 billion in Medicare fraud. That’s billion with a B. David Gentile pulled $1.6 billion. Philip Esformes defrauded Medicare for $1.2 billion in unnecessary bills. Three men. Three Republicans. All vastly more money than what’s alleged in Minnesota, and you won’t find MAGA anywhere near those stories with pitchforks. Why? Because those fraudsters look like them.
Meanwhile, Somalis are less than 2 percent of Minnesota’s population and less than a tenth of one percent of the United States. Yet suddenly this is the fraud emergency? Suddenly Minnesota is the epicenter of American decay? Spare me. The people who pardoned felons, commuted the sentences of grifters, and cheered while white-collar crime flourished are now pretending fraud is a moral line too sacred to cross.
trump himself is a convicted felon on 34 business fraud charges, and has pardoned or commuted dozens of criminals, but Minnesota daycare centers are the crisis? Please. This is not about crime. It is about a narrative. It is about using Somali immigrants as political kindling. It is about creating folk villains so white-collar criminals in suits remain invisible.
And we cannot separate this from trump calling Somalians “garbage,” telling them to “go back where they came from,” or the racist fever dream of “they’re eating the cats and dogs.” Minnesota is not an isolated scandal. It fits squarely into a historical pattern of scapegoating the same groups again and again.
If real fraud is found through legitimate DOJ investigation… good. Prosecute. But a YouTube ambush is not accountability. It is propaganda. And fraud committed by white businessmen in boardrooms is no less criminal than fraud committed in childcare programs. In fact, by scale, it’s worse.
Until outrage is universal, outrage is political.
Caption: Fraud isn’t racial. The narrative is.
This Story Conveniently Reinforces Elon Musk’s “Waste, Fraud, Abuse” Playbook
Here is where the timing should make everyone sit up straighter.
When Musk took over Twitter, he slashed departments, fired critical safety teams, gutted Trust & Safety, and justified it all as eliminating “waste, fraud, and abuse.” The cuts weren’t surgical, they were scorched-earth. And in hindsight, stories like Minnesota help retroactively justify his brutality to the public:
“See? Fraud is everywhere. Cuts were necessary. Government and institutions are bloated. We need stronger, harsher oversight.”
A viral scandal like this becomes the emotional fuel for austerity. It reinforces the idea that oversight is a luxury and cruelty is efficiency.
If you want to shrink government, privatize institutions, cut social programs, or justify layoffs, nothing lubricates that faster than a dramatic story of “corruption.” And the right knows that.
Minnesota is not just a fraud case. It’s narrative terrain.
And Here’s the Darker, More Sinister Layer
Stories like this create the perfect pretext for suspicion and hostility toward immigrant communities. Especially when every post, every article, every tweet makes sure to mention that the alleged perpetrators are Somali. No subtlety. No nuance. No hesitation.
It signals to a very specific audience:
“Look who is stealing from you.”
“Look who is living off your taxes.”
“Look who you should be angry at.”
It is not about fraud. It is about permission.
Permission to judge.
Permission to stereotype.
Permission to fear.
And for some, permission to hate.
We’ve seen what happens when suspicion becomes policy. When immigrant groups become headlines, talking points, and scapegoats. Haitians, Mexicans, Muslims, Afghans, Syrians… trump once described entire nations as “shithole countries” where “they speak languages nobody even knows.” He was not joking. He was indoctrinating.
Stories like Minnesota are narrative scaffolding. A moral staging ground. They let bigots say publicly what they already believed privately.
Fraud becomes the delivery system. The payload is xenophobia.
Fraud becomes the delivery system. Xenophobia is the payload.
What This Moment Actually Feels Like
A narrative test balloon. A story being shaped into a weapon. A coordinated push to tie criminality to Somali immigrants, to Democrats, to Ilhan Omar by proximity. Not with proven legal findings, but with vibes, rhetoric, and repetition. A soft launch for the next talking point in an election cycle that needs enemies, villains, and scapegoats.
If real fraud is happening, prosecute it. I will stand with anyone who demands accountability and transparency. But accountability is not a YouTube video. It is evidence. It is prosecution. It is process. And the truth does not need a viral army to make it real.
So I am not saying there is no fraud. I am saying we should not let influencers replace investigators. We should value facts more than clicks. And we should never let political opportunists decide who the public should fear.
Because I’ve seen this movie before. First they frame the story. Then they frame the people.
And this time, the target is clear.
Minnesota is not just a fraud story. It is a narrative battlefield.
The least we can do is refuse to be foot soldiers for someone else’s war.
If you want to join the conversation and be part of a community that pushes back against disinformation instead of drowning in it, become a paid subscriber. Paid members unlock comments and future deep-dive chapters in this series.
If you’re here from Twitter/X, welcome.
I’d love to hear your perspective… even if you disagree.
Comments are paid-only, so feel free to subscribe if you want in.
Why do you think the outrage only erupted AFTER the YouTube video, not during years of DOJ investigation? Is the right testing messaging for a broader anti-immigrant 2025 playbook?
They've been after Mike Walz since he ran w/ Kamala..You're right the Fraud investigation is far from new & in fact in March of this year an investigation that the Biden Administration had worked since 2021 took the indictments to trial and won. I think once that case was won it was a gateway for Pam and Company took that trial and used it to a create this chaos to a totally uninformed US electorate..How did a 20 something yr old uncover millions in fraud other than with the indictments and trial data which Kash and Pam are now claiming as their own and using it to "uncover" more fraud. Now this cracker jack reporter finds another "fraud???" So now Comer & Noem are jumping in on the "investigation" bandwagon - how convenient..
BTW of note is that I saw a post where the "My Pillow Guy" is running for Governor against Walz...
Coincidence -- I don't think so.
Whatever did we do before scapegoating conveniently reared its ugly head in the bible? It has now been raised to an art form, and the right embellishes it daily.